安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










Mg, OTOH is well behaved - it needs a lot of heat dumped into it before it ignites, has good mechanical properties and you can even make jet engine parts out of it.
IMO potassium shouldn't even be available as structural material in game, only as possible coolant.
Magnesium is nasty if it catches fire, but it's pretty inert in bulk and due to being light and strong is attractive enough to be used as structural material in automotive and aviation - both civilian and miltary.
Potassium OTOH is downright nasty all the time - soft, melty, reacts with pretty much everything and catches fire for no good reason. Definitely not a CM (or anything else structural) material.
Selenium doesn't seem to be used as structural material at all and solar abundance is low, so I don't know why it is so cheap, nor if it's actually attractive mechanically (which I didn't expect since it's essentially a more metallic cousin of sulfur).
Anyway, you have definitely hit home when it comes to cheap and light - no argument here - and the ship is definitely a keeper.
I still think that rapid fire guns would serve it better than micromissiles (the RG is sweet, though; also I wonder how well would those micromissiles perform if fired out of high velocity gun or blast launcher) and that it might be possible to improve upon this design with changes to mass distribution (effectively free turnabout boost), roll capability and some sort of thin anti-flash layer (silica aerogel?), possibly shaving the very rim of boron filament cap to make up for the extra mass and cost.
Just my two cents.