安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Wouldn't be opposed to it if they dev wanted to go that way. I just don't think making spears better at everything isn't actually very realistic and not at all fun. If so this would be the "Spears are OP" mod. A game where there's no reason to use the majority of other weapons would be boring.
Lances are a mounted weapon? Most knights were on horses but they wouldn't run around with a lance while they were off it lol. That's not even a true if you switched out lance with spear.
Polearms are only really good defensively if you can keep someone away from you, much harder to do without a line of other spearmen. If someone with a sword is wearing good enough armor to just run at you and get inside your spear's range, there's not much you can do to stop them from swiftly murdering you (except maybe drawing a weapon that's not a spear). Spears were extremely common and popular in the middle ages, but there were definitely people using swords them, even if they had an intact polearm.
In a game like Kenshi with relatively small scale combat, I think it makes sense for spears to have a defensive weakness, with swords being versatile like they are in real life. Polearms meanwhile still maintain their reach as a stat which happens to be their advantage in real life.
That's why medieval knights only used their swords once they broke their lance.