安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题







—Please help me with mod visibility, I appreciate it!


'army_destruction_alliance_strength_ratio' or 'army_destruction_enemy_strength_ratio' is the point at which 'ume_concerned_army_destruction' would kick into effect. So once the army falls below that ratio then it goes into effect.
I've also been told 'army_destruction_alliance_strength_ratio' & 'army_destruction_enemy_strength_ratio' have a considerable effect but again don't want to mess with that just yet.
At any rate, thanks again for giving me more clarity of this. I am now, out of pure curiosity, see what a battle is like if I set the army loss penalty to 0
Then I lowered the penalty for the AI's general dying/fleeing in 'ume_concerned_general_dead_ai' (and related). My reasoning here is that the AI tends to suicide rush their lord (especially if it is mounted) ahead of its army. So the AI most of the time pretty much takes a huge leadership hit before the fighting even really starts, which seems to have a domino effect the whole battle.