Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Tl;dr I didn't put Fanatic militarist because the military doesn't truly define them as a society, but rather an attraction to the public good. If anything they're fanatic egalitarian, but I chose materialist as the third ethic point to represent their well-roundedness.
Yeah they were really difficult to categorize. They have a very rich and multifaceted culture in Mass effect lore. When I pick out the ethics for these mods though, I'm looking at what defines the culture. For the Turians, my impression from my research is that their biggest value is public order, and what best serves the public good. Everything else stems from that.
For instance, my observation is that even though all their leaders and officials are members of the military, what really attracts them to the army in the first place is the desire to serve the collective.
-They took on the Volus as a client race because they had little interest in the inherently selfish pursuit of wealth that comes with business.
-Their society is a meritocracy- the best rise, and while some few are demoted it's not considered their fault, but rather the person who promoted them beyond their capabilities. Again, public good trumps personal advancement.