A lazy attempt to steal your money with "art" they didn't even make, It's AI-generated and very poorly at that. Extremely short if you skip all of the boring and uninteresting dialogue (It reads like someone poorly explaining good dialogue in the next room). Took me 27 minutes to do the following: turn down the volume because all of these types of games blow my eardrums out, read through the intro, notice the terrible AI "art", then get tired of reading the lame, corny dialogue and proceed to skip most of it. I did give each character's first meeting dialogue a chance and every time I was spit in the face and wasn't even surprised after finding out its AI "art". Also nowhere on this game's page says "AI generated scenes" and I would be okay with this game a little more if it actually said that on the page instead of making you pay $2.99 to find out. It's short, ridiculously short however I'm not complaining as now I get an easy refund, and yes I'm 100% refunding this. It was awful and a disgusting trick to get $3 (minus steams cut). This upsets me as I fund a few games on Patreon that put so much love and care into their visual novels, they have interesting characters, great stories, fantastic CGS, REAL amazing art, and dialogue that isn't just boring and a carbon copy of "Visual Novels for Dummies". I would rather spend $50 a month on ONE of those creators than let this wannabe keep my $3.
The only reason I would be okay with this game is if you actually put effort into any part of it tbh. For example, refine your AI "art" and manually fix the mistakes like the hands or the background to make it look like actual art but still state that this was AI-generated in your game. Lastly don't be corny or boring with your dialogue, literally right after you get there your step-cousin needs help, and asks you to take in the laundry from the line outside. While doing so the OC thinks to himself "Should I sniff her panties" but doesn't because she could be watching. So he stuffs one of her socks in his pocket and jerks off with it later. She walks in on you doing so and then helps you??? It was entertaining for the absurdity of it but that's a lazy attempt at comedy. I don't know what else to say besides don't support this person unless they start adding their "art" is AI generated and improves their dialogue, I hope they do improve and learn from their mistakes.

Just saw a curator review this game, YOU ARE NOT GIVING THIS A PASSABLE GRADE. Bro this is below passable, this is something anyone can make with ease. I COULD MAKE THIS GAME AND MAKE IT BETTER, I can't make the art myself but why would I when I use AI right? die. GOOFY, GOOFY, GOOFY!

A lazy attempt to steal your money with "art" they didn't even make, It's AI-generated and very poorly at that. Extremely short if you skip all of the boring and uninteresting dialogue (It reads like someone poorly explaining good dialogue in the next room). Took me 27 minutes to do the following: turn down the volume because all of these types of games blow my eardrums out, read through the intro, notice the terrible AI "art", then get tired of reading the lame, corny dialogue and proceed to skip most of it. I did give each character's first meeting dialogue a chance and every time I was spit in the face and wasn't even surprised after finding out its AI "art". Also nowhere on this game's page says "AI generated scenes" and I would be okay with this game a little more if it actually said that on the page instead of making you pay $2.99 to find out. It's short, ridiculously short however I'm not complaining as now I get an easy refund, and yes I'm 100% refunding this. It was awful and a disgusting trick to get $3 (minus steams cut). This upsets me as I fund a few games on Patreon that put so much love and care into their visual novels, they have interesting characters, great stories, fantastic CGS, REAL amazing art, and dialogue that isn't just boring and a carbon copy of "Visual Novels for Dummies". I would rather spend $50 a month on ONE of those creators than let this wannabe keep my $3. The only reason I would be okay with this game is if you actually put effort into any part of it tbh. For example, refine your AI "art" and manually fix the mistakes like the hands or the background to make it look like actual art but still state that this was AI-generated in your game. Lastly don't be corny or boring with your dialogue, literally right after you get there your step-cousin needs help, and asks you to take in the laundry from the line outside. While doing so the OC thinks to himself "Should I sniff her panties" but doesn't because she could be watching. So he stuffs one of her socks in his pocket and jerks off with it later. She walks in on you doing so and then helps you??? It was entertaining for the absurdity of it but that's a lazy attempt at comedy. I don't know what else to say besides don't support this person unless they start adding their "art" is AI generated and improves their dialogue, I hope they do improve and learn from their mistakes. Just saw a curator review this game, YOU ARE NOT GIVING THIS A PASSABLE GRADE. Bro this is below passable, this is something anyone can make with ease. I COULD MAKE THIS GAME AND MAKE IT BETTER, I can't make the art myself but why would I when I use AI right? die. GOOFY, GOOFY, GOOFY!