安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题

I understand your point and respect your opinion, but at least on my hardware and with both Windows 7 and 10 the game was not stable enough. I experienced crashes too often while wandering through the wilds, while playing the game vanilla.
Regarding console version, I find it odd to re-use the same interface that was designed for a console with a gamepad and 480p-1080p resolution, for a PC with mouse, keyboard and often higher resoultion screen.
The interface was the first thing that bogged me down and in my mind held the game back. Besides interface- and stability-mods, the rest are down to a matter of taste and artistic vision.
before they play it on PC, because mods are a distraction from the base experience that skyrim players need to learn to adjust to without making any changes to it. Then, they are free to play around with it in whatever way they see fit.
Also, the game is stable enough as it is without stability mods, but I will admit that stability mods will indeed improve the stability, even though I feel that this is not necessary unless you have a huge load order of player made content.