Been there since 2000.

On the contrary of our name, we do not pirate. We support the developers of games IF they are worth the money, ofcourse.

Reviews by the people, for the people.

Quality reviews for Quality Games.

查看全部

热门讨论

查看全部 (1)

近期公告

If you are in this group, please check out the curator tab.

2015 年 7 月 14 日 - GV-97 | 0 条留言

If you want to support me and Rokk, please follow us a curators.

了解更多

查看全部 (25)

STEAM 鉴赏家

Secret Infinite Pirate Society 的评测

"Quality games, hidden gems, and more. We try to emphasize on non-mainstream games."

这些是 Secret Infinite Pirate Society 最近撰写的评测

查看全部

6 条留言

< >

[Cash.net]♣Durandil♣ 2015 年 2 月 26 日下午 8:27

Again, it's not because of the game itself, I don't play it myself, it's because of the image it has. I agree Max Payne series, Viscera and Brutal legend deserve light, so do other quality titles.

GV-97

2015 年 2 月 26 日下午 6:30

I will remove it, because you guys have a good point. My apologies.

[Cash.net]♣Durandil♣ 2015 年 2 月 26 日上午 8:01

I do agree with Tyrant here, honestly a CoD featured in a quality review group like this one hurts a bit.
It's not because Cods are terrible games, but rather because Cod does NOT need any more lighthing from this group or from anyone else, it drains enough attention on itself already.

Moon Goose 2015 年 2 月 21 日上午 12:04

Well, that's mostly because the companies affiliated with the CoD franchise are essentially trying to 'milk' the concept out - and they've been doing it for way too long. The games are incredibly 'samey', and the only real difference is improved online gameplay, which could just as easily be done on an internet-based game that receives updates on a regular basis.

I think it's safe to safe that they're just producing more CoD games these days for the profit, rather than the true quality of the product.