安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题

~~~~
Japan Campaign - In the East
I would like to go on record - as an old-time grognard been around since the game of "Empire" - the Japan Campaign - In the East.....staring of in Phillipines.....well I played it hardcore level and changed the random battle results to 20%.....and after one false-start, let me just congratulate the developed of this game - Job well done!
~
(text deleted per 1000 limit)
~
Now with all that said in scenarios with rail I think there should be an "incremental" cost to put troops on the rails and that there ought be a limit to it - cause that really was not for "free". Additionally, with the "core troops" established later in the campaigns (at least the Russian one I completed) things tend to get a bit boring near the end cause it is just too easy - so maybe there needs to be an option to balance that somehow - cause what I enjoy is a challenge!
~
Warm Regards,
Buffalo_Ken