安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
管理员 
In real-life we don't give the same punishment to someone who knowingly bought a stolen diamond necklace, as was given to someone who robbed 50 jewelry-stores.
Currently with SR tags, you're either clean, potential danger, or part of the worst scum TF2 has ever seen. There's no middle way between Caution and Scammer.
And, yet another person wondering: which of SR's rules were followed, which rules don't apply, and why? There's no arguments to the statement of "SteamREP did follow its own rules". I'm not saying you're wrong, I don't think anybody here is implying that, but where are the arguments? How can we trust your judgement in this case, and know your reasoning, if neither are shared?
I think this is also something I just unearthed in my mind. Why doesn't SteamREP come up with something that isn't a scammer tag, but a different type of tag entirely? I think being called a scammer when you pay cash or whatever for high value items to a scammer isn't right. Call it something else, but scammer. In no way did Potato scam anyone, so why does he have a scammer tag?
Chaos, EXPLAIN how SteamREP followed their own rules. What rule did they follow?