CHAT PARA HABLAR Y JUGAR Y POSTEAR MEMES

The European Commission presented in September of 2016 a proposal of directive on rights of author in the digital only market that little by little advances in his parliamentary processing. An update of the valid directive, approved in May of 2001, that includes two especially controversial points: the article 11 and the article 13.

The first tackles the digital uses of the publications of press, from appointments to links, awarding to the editors the right to authorise or forbid an aggregation or indexing during two decades. And the second establishes the surveillance of contents protected by part of platforms, requiring them to monitor what the users go up to his services.

In spite of that this proposal of directive would solve some problems dragged along the time according to the *Electronic *Frontier *Foundation, "creates others much bigger: problems so big that loom with doing be shipwrecked the same internet". Why they defend this posture? What could involve the approval of the current draft?

The controversial article 13
Drafted with a language that can result ambiguous and imprecise, this article signals in his section 1 that "the providers of services of the society of the information that store and facilitate public access to big quantities of works or #another loaded provision by his users will adopt [...] The pertinent measures to ensure the correct operation of the celebrated agreements with the headlines of rights for the use [...] Or to prevent that they are available in his services [...]".

It adds, between the measures to take, "the use of effective technicians of recognition of contents". These technicians of recognition of contents suggested by the own managerial will be, signals the section 3 of the article, "suitable and proportionate, taking into account, in particular, the nature of the services, the availability of the technologies and his efficiency to the light of the technological evolution".

For the *EFF, involves that "the places that allow to the users publish texts, sounds, codes, fixed images or in movement or other works protected by rights of author for public consumption will have to filter all the contributions of his users by means of a database of works protected by rights of author". In this definition would go in from Twitter to Wikipedia, going through forums or communities.

The *patronal of the digital technological industry in Spain, *AMETIC, thinks that "eradicates the juridical security that has contributed during more than a decade the exemption of responsibility". Simona Levi, theatrical director and founder of *Xnet, describes the monitory like a "*gobernanza algorithmic" and although the measures circumscribe to the rights of author, think that will extend further looming to the freedom of expression

Like the article 13 would involve to punish to any web that do not block the rape of the rights of author, but does not punish to the people that abuse of the system, the foundation ensures that "somebody could go up all the Wikipedia to a system of filtered (for example, one of the a lot of places that incorporate the content of Wikipedia in his own databases) and afterwards demand the property on the same in Twitter, Facebook and Wordpress".

Until they did not resolve the false disputes, says, "all the world would see prevented to quote Wikipedia in any one of these services". Besides, they signal that this article also would leave went to those who saw his own work "censored thanks to a bad operation of the *bot of copyright". Only it could appeal and expect. Finally, they add that "it also could require that Wikipedia filter the sendings to the encyclopaedia and his surrounding projects, as *Wikimedia *Commons".

It is a small sample of what could suppose for the free encyclopaedia and the group of the European network. This article, that also can result ambiguous and imprecise given his editorial, is for groups of activists by the rights in internet an attempt of tax Google or canon *AEDE to the European. For the professor Raquel *Xalabarder, chair of Copyright of the *Universitat *Oberta of Catalonia, awards a new right to the editors of press "to authorise and/or forbid the aggregation and digital indexing of his publications (a link in internet until them) during 20 years".

In opinion of the *Electronic *Frontier *Foundation, according to the article 11 each country member of the European Union will be able to create a new right of author on the news. If it approves , they say that "it will have to link to a website of news of a way that satisfy the limitations and exceptions of the 28 laws [by the 28 countries that form the EU] or will have to obtain a licence". This would be incompatible with any type of *wiki, included the Wikipedia, and would have implications in the rest of the web.

The *letrado Sánchez *Almeida keeps that this article would be "a danger for the collective rights to the culture of all the European citizens, the right to the *remix, the right to merge works..." And *AMETIC considers that "no only will affect to *agregadores of news but to any provider of services of society of the information.

In April argued amendments in the Commission of Juridical Subjects of the European Parliament and in less than two weeks, the next 20 June, the same commission will vote the proposal. Once that the European Parliament have voted a text, in virtue of the procedure of *codecisión, the Council would have to fix his position.

In case that these two institutions disagreed, would initiate a procedure of conciliation. When it reach a political agreement between both institutions will vote the final text approved. Any amendment or reform of what this draft says at present would have to carry out previously to his step and approval by the European parliament. It expects an agreement before finals of year by part of the European Commission.




THE SUMMARY BEGINS *AQUI -
*basicamente is a *projecto of *europa that wants to do that the internet always was watched and remove us the freedom of *expresion 1 example of this new law *sera that the *busquedas *seran *automaticas - *basicamente will not be able to look for what *querramos and the companies *controlarian all internet this *significaria the *adios to - *memes-songs - all -
tomorrow *sera 1 *votacion for the people that want to that it fulfil -
in case to fulfil serious only in *europa BUT *despues *sera *latinoamerica - and *asi until doing all the world
favour to share or *podriamos remain us without freedom of internet?
Of *expresion - *weno freedom in general