STEAM 组

CharlieTweetsDetected CTweets

加入组

STEAM 组

CharlieTweetsDetected CTweets

6,311
成员

259

游戏中

2,488

在线

成立于

2025 年 9 月 14 日

语言

英语

国家/地区

United States

总览公告讨论活动成员留言鉴赏家

关于 CharlieTweetsDetected

Stop buying games from people who cheer for your demise.

Follow me for updates and receipts at: https://x.com/KayfabeMediaYT/status/1968198425272520767

On September 10th 2025, - well I'm not sure how much I can write here without being removed, but you know what happened.

In the aftermath, numerous individuals cheered, many work for game developers, and those developers indulge them. We will not stand idle and purchase from people who encourage such behavior.

Rhetoric used by many people led to the event of Sept 10th.

If a game is listed here, someone from this studio has cheered on the events of September 10th or those like it, or they use rhetoric that justifies acts like it and in doing so can be interpreted as a call for it to happen again. We will also call out those who join groups designated as well, i'm not sure what words are okay to say here, but politically criminal I'll say.

We will not stand idle and purchase from people who want you to share the same fate.

查看全部

热门讨论

查看全部 (16)

近期公告

Reviewing games non politically.

2 月 28 日 - CharlieTheWise | 8 条留言

Just so you guys know, I've been doing a few 'non political' reviews. I've been getting a few games submitted through curator connect. I felt like if they are going to send me games, its only fair I offer a recommendation if I thought they had something to offer. I make sure to tag these 'non political'.

I felt wrong getting games and doing nothing with them. They are typically super indie games, often asset flip stuff, or first time unity devs.

I do a social media search to make sure they aren't calling for violence anywhere, and I haven't seen anything yet. I also don't do non recommend if I don't personally care for the game, I'm saving that for political reasons only. I don't want to unfairly label a game with a not recommended tag cause I fear some people might not look at the context.

Just letting you know. When I started this I didn't even know this system existed, and when I noticed it I thought I really should help out these guys if I think they deserved it. It kind of goes against the ideological line of the curator, but not adding them to the 'celebrate these devs instead' list, and I'm making it clear its not political.

了解更多

Regarding the recent Guardian article:

2 月 26 日 - CharlieTheWise | 17 条留言

https://www.theguardian.com/games/2023/feb/08/pushing-buttons-hogwarts-legacy-jk-rowling

For those who are not aware, the UK site 'The Guardian' recently posted an article about bigotry in Steam groups, and curators.

While they mentioned this curator, they did not specifically say it was bigoted but its inclusion in such article, I find, is guilt by association.

In the article they interviewed the developer of the game 'Coven', who on Sept 10th, before all the facts were known, posted a meme of George Lucas saying 'it's like poetry', in regards to his (Coven Devs) own comment that Kirk was killed by an old white man (now know to be false).

This got him on the list. Yet this was not mentioned in the above article. It characterized this curator as : (their words not mine) "a curator devoted to recommending games based solely on whether their developers are perceived to have correctly mourned the assassination of rightwing activist Charlie Kirk."

At no point have I said its because I didn't like how someone 'mourned'. Its how they celebrated it or mocked it or used similar language that lead to it happening.

They also mention his cries that his game was review bombed with 'RIP Charlie' mentions. calling it harassment. They made no effort to mention any time I have said 'do not harass'. I've never told people to do that, I have merely called out their hateful posts they publicly posted on their accounts they use to promote their game.

They go on to mention how Steam support was unhelpful in removing this curator (Thank you Steam) because they said it wasn't off topic, because its based on actions of the developers. Guardian did not say if they agree or disagree, but its worth noting they were pro-Hogwarts Legacy boycott (https://www.theguardian.com/games/2023/feb/08/pushing-buttons-hogwarts-legacy-jk-rowling).

Why am I posting about this over a week late? Because I had emailed them a week ago, and even though they said they would get back to me, they have not. Only to say the relevant editor is on leave. Which is unacceptable. You can not slander me and the people of this group like that, and claim the editor isn't available. The Guardian doesn't cease to operate, pull another editor. The new cycle has moved on, more people have seen the slander than will ever see whatever retraction you offer at this point.

Again, I want to reiterate. DO NOT HARASS anyone involved in this story.

Also, I choose to remain anonymous and I do not monetize this for a number of reasons. One reason I feel if I do I can't remain anonymous at least not fully,

Due to this, its not legally actionable in anyway and my day to day life isn't affected. So why do I care?

Because dishonest reporting should always be called out. Make their cost benefit analysis for dishonestly force them to ere on the side of truth. Misrepresentations no matter how small should not go unchallenged.

了解更多

查看全部 (206)

STEAM 鉴赏家

CharlieTweetsDetected 的评测

"On September 10th 2025, - not sure how much I can write here without being removed, but Charlie Kirk died. In the aftermath, numerous individuals cheered. These people worked on these games."

这些是 CharlieTweetsDetected 最近撰写的评测

查看全部

543 条留言

查看全部

< >

26 Rats in a trenchcoat

7 小时以前

(Seriously though the wikipedia article on it is still one of the most comically blatant examples of recent-history revisionism imaginable, they're not even trying to hide it and it's incredibly disgusting)

26 Rats in a trenchcoat

7 小时以前

Yup, well put. It's a very good litmus test.

Only issue is if it's someone who didn't live through the original Gamer Gate and was just fed the wikipedia lies about it, they might fundamentally believe it actually was some sort of harassment campaign, but in those cases reasonable people could still at least entertain the possibility that they could be missing something or that it's not the whole picture.

Kaos

7 小时以前

Is it surprising that the kind of people who forcefully inject their politics into gaming would also dance gleefully at the deaths of those of apposing views?

You can basically ask a person "What is Gamer Gate" and if they answer includes the word incel or chud you immediately know their entire political stance from Charlie to Trump and all the rest of it. It is a hivemind.