安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
What is the least amount of points to make a flat polygon (face)?
1? No that would just be a point.
2? No that would be a line.
3? Yup! You can definitely make a single flat surface no matter what as long as the three point vectors are linearly independent.
4? Nope. You can technically have non-faces with 4 points.
Let's take a look:
From the top, both these polygons look flat (left is a quad, right is a tri):
http://i.imgur.com/BSCQ9PB.png
However, you'll notice that from a different angle, the 4-faced polygon isn't actually flat...
http://i.imgur.com/lCLn9w2.png
3D Programs can work with quads just fine, but engines limit their models to tris because that is the minimum amount to make faces. When you export your own models via the smd exporter, you'll notice that it automatically triangulates your model (Try it: Export a test model as an smd file > import it back into blender > suddenly it will be made up of tris instead of quads).
Obviously modelers don't model with tris... They model with quads first, and then go in and detail (manually editing stuff, sculpting, etc).
...
...
...
why did i ctrl + T and then save?!??!? T-T
xD