安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题

Yuri is my favorite, but Monika is the most tragic. I don't think the game was evil, it just didn't allow a Monika route, but her sentience began to make her desperate for more, and believing the others were 'just characters' in the video game makes for an easy excuse for deletion.
The whole Meta aspect means there should have been a full Visual Novel the girls just If, Then, Else, their way through. Monika began messing with the code first, but Yuri and Natsuki showed signs that they were struggling against Monika's interference, after it breaks. Just not with the same level of clarity.
Game Theory explains why they were all somewhat sentient, just maybe not 'awake' like Sayori becomes in the end of each route. Monika messed with their AI behavior, something simple characters running through a script wouldn't need.
And the song she wrote is really heartbreaking, if you think about it. SO, this is why Monika shouldn't be deleted.
Nothing has been confirmed, but Game Theory on Youtube has a pair of videos that break down why they believe that the Portrait of Markov book is a game being released in 2018, and it's both fairly convincing and crazy interesting. They also mention reasons they believe the girls, or at least Monika and Yuri, will be in it.