安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
135 
举报此帖
meh, ive zero interest in coding.
However, its a useful skill.
Try it, if it interests you, dont, if like me, it doesn't.
no. it's made coding easier. which is even more reason to learn now. there's still a window of opportunity of about 20 years where job demand for coding is still astronomical. and it's also easier to learn now. so it's the best possible time to learn.
yeah if you dislike enough that it would make you unhappy to do it or a living then of course this doesn't apply to you (or if you just already have a 150k salary doing something else).
there are multiple studies that show that ai has not reduced job demand for tech. it will eventually but not for awhile. worst case 10 years, best case 20 years. and the salaries in tech are insane, so you should take advantage of it: levels.fyi. also if you're already in tech when the ai reaches a point that it can truly autonomously build entire systems (it's not even close to that), you'll just convert to being an architect or product manager. there will still be a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ of jobs for people who are like 'managers' of ai, who can look at the system an ai builds and determine if it needs to be modied, adjusted, etc. AI is just LLMS right now it's not a true thinking machine.
at present, ai's coding capabilities generally have made coding 10-15% faster. its greatest capability is building a first (but incomplete) draft of a small app from scratch, but 99% of coding is building or modifying large systems, and it's nowhere near the ability to do that, simply because large systems have too many hyper-specific design choices that are unique to that business, and LLM's generalize from public code repos. LLM's might not ever be able to do that autonomously.
You mean you dont have to read any of the source material your self. And just hope that the code the ai gives you works.
Ive never seen someone "vibe code" a actual good project. It always falls apart at the end.
I tried using ai and it was basically useless at coding, does pretty good as a teaching aide and doesnt get to annoyed if you ask it a million dumb questions.
It can be especially useful for helping me understand why a block of code doesnt do what I think it should do.
no, mostly ide tools that autocomplete (much) better than before. coding is more enjoyable now because when you're doing the boring stuff like updating code it can predict other places (only in the same file, currently) that need a similar update. autocomplete has existed for a long time, but LLM's are really good at it.
vibe coding is interesting though. i've seen some of the tools. they aren't really ready yet, but they look exciting. but even then you still need a human driving and they're not building large or complex systems and it will still be developer-intensive even when/if the human isn't modifying every single line of code.
well yeah because it was a passive agressive jab at those huffpo workers who got laid off. (err, buzzfeed)