安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Let's see, which sounds like fascism to you:
1. A mayor deliberately and illegally disregarding a federal law he/she doesn't like that was passed by a bipartisan Congressional effort
OR
2. Legally using troops to protect federal workers that are under violent attack and to enforce the laws on the books
It's amazing that the "no kings" crowd has no problem with elected leaders disregarding the laws when it suits their interests.
Hey now...
They also violated their own state bylaws quite terminally if California or Michigan are any examples.
Weird how nobody ever gets in trouble for falsely restricting someone's rights like that.
Make an actual post for this. Here it's redundant like me having a second appendix.