A couple of days ago Grok told me that the soviet union fell in the 2010's.

I am not worried.

I still think that the only job will rest to humanity in the future, will be being a pro athlete...

引用自 NSLucs：

I still think that the only job will rest to humanity in the future, will be being a pro athlete...

Also artists and other creatives. As much as AI is good at mimicking art it is not good at creating novel art and probably never will be.

引用自 Zeybek：

This is gonna be come. I am graduated Computer Engineer and ChatGPT 4.5 is passed Turing Test rate as %73, there will be no human needed for many jobs that "automated".

If you are doing any kind of "automated" jobs, start learning prompt engineering today.

My best advice.

Thanks.

Relax. You cannot fathom how many calculations your brain performed just for sight alone within the last second.

The human brain is more powerful and deep than you can imagine. ChatGPT and LLM shouldn’t hold their breaths, lol.

引用自 Gracey Face：

引用自 NSLucs：

I still think that the only job will rest to humanity in the future, will be being a pro athlete...

Also artists and other creatives. As much as AI is good at mimicking art it is not good at creating novel art and probably never will be.

Lets say it will be very similar in rate of %70-%90

引用自 Zeybek：

引用自 Gracey Face：

Also artists and other creatives. As much as AI is good at mimicking art it is not good at creating novel art and probably never will be.

Lets say it will be very similar in rate of %70-%90

AI’s perfection in mimicking human art is only based on how much it can steal, stupidly, based on sophisticated algorithms. Human intelligence and creativity is on a whole other level.

引用自 Gracey Face：

引用自 NSLucs：

I still think that the only job will rest to humanity in the future, will be being a pro athlete...

Also artists and other creatives. As much as AI is good at mimicking art it is not good at creating novel art and probably never will be.

Maybe, but it can became very similar.
I really doubt AI will do something like Michael Jackson did, but I really believe that it can create songs like Sabrina Carpenter and Illit ones

引用自 Maverick：

引用自 Zeybek：

Lets say it will be very similar in rate of %70-%90

AI’s perfection in mimicking human art is only based on how much it can steal, stupidly, based on sophisticated algorithms. Human intelligence and creativity is on a whole other level.

Human Creativity = Intent + Experience A human artist creates because they have something to say. Their art is a result of their lived experiences, their emotions, their political beliefs, their reaction to the world around them. It is an act of proactive communication.

AI Generation = Pattern + Prompt An AI "creates" because it was given a command. It is an act of reactive synthesis. It can only remix, combine, and iterate on the patterns it has already seen in its training data. It has no life, no experience, and no intent of its own.

This is different. But at the end point, yes. But in later, the Human Doctor, Human Lawyer or Human Psychologist will be more valuable. But i know that most people will prefer the AI Doctor, AI Lawyer or AI Human for costs.

what happens if you fail the turing test but you are a human being?

引用自 salamander：

what happens if you fail the turing test but you are a human being?

Then you didn’t get all the silver coins in Diddy Kong Racing :3

引用自 salamander：

what happens if you fail the turing test but you are a human being?

They look around nervously after failing to find the synth component in your skull and then try to hide the corpse.

引用自 salamander：

what happens if you fail the turing test but you are a human being?

https://www.sciencenewstoday.org/the-turing-test-what-it-proves-and-what-it-doesnt

Why Humans Are So Easy to Fool

One lesson from the history of the Turing Test is that humans are often less discerning than we imagine. We attribute intelligence and empathy to machines even when their mechanisms are shallow. When a chatbot responds with kindness or wit, we feel understood—even if the machine has no awareness of what it is saying.

This tendency, sometimes called the “Eliza effect,” reveals as much about humans as about machines. We are social beings who seek connection, often eager to believe that another entity shares our thoughts and feelings. Our minds are finely tuned to recognize patterns of language, tone, and rhythm, and we project personality into them almost automatically.

Thus, the Turing Test not only measures the machine’s skill but also exposes the human heart’s readiness to see intelligence where we long to find it. This does not diminish the achievement of building sophisticated AI, but it does remind us that deception is a two-way street: the machine imitates, but we, too, are predisposed to be persuaded.

It means you are bad at lying or convincing others, that you are human. Go to acting school.

Why hire humans for a 'prompt engineer' position when an AI is more than qualified to manage AI.

引用自 Gracey Face：

They look around nervously after failing to find the synth component in your skull and then try to hide the corpse.

at least i will probably get recycled into cat food or something. as long as the cats are okay

引用自 Utiviroo：

https://www.sciencenewstoday.org/the-turing-test-what-it-proves-and-what-it-doesnt

It means you are bad at lying or convincing others, that you are human. Go to acting school.

i fear i am cooked then when the cyberpunk bladerunner days are upon us

I put down 4 cyberpstchosis people already