安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
LOL LET THEM UNTIL THEY ADD WALLET FEATURE FILTER
real uwu
Not the only measurement that gets exaggerated, to be sure.
And this just in: people have preferences. Every "short king" feeling aggrieved about this should check if they have an unspoken "no fatties" clause in their own make-or-break dating system.
I rest my case.
You don't need a filter for that. It's easy to see who has money if you know what to look for. If I was a woman looking for a rich man I'd be looking for nice backgrounds in their pics - nice furniture/fancy restaurant/holiday destinations. White veneered teeth, nice suit and clothes, a nice watch and expensive haircut. A photograph of your car is a bit much but you can take a photo inside it so the interior is visible. It's pretty hard to fake being rich.
you don't have to worry you shouldn't be on dating apps since you already have someone uwu