Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem



LOL LET THEM UNTIL THEY ADD WALLET FEATURE FILTER
real uwu
Not the only measurement that gets exaggerated, to be sure.
And this just in: people have preferences. Every "short king" feeling aggrieved about this should check if they have an unspoken "no fatties" clause in their own make-or-break dating system.
I rest my case.
You don't need a filter for that. It's easy to see who has money if you know what to look for. If I was a woman looking for a rich man I'd be looking for nice backgrounds in their pics - nice furniture/fancy restaurant/holiday destinations. White veneered teeth, nice suit and clothes, a nice watch and expensive haircut. A photograph of your car is a bit much but you can take a photo inside it so the interior is visible. It's pretty hard to fake being rich.
you don't have to worry you shouldn't be on dating apps since you already have someone uwu