安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
this creates an enormous design challenge. this can be used to feed hype and market the series, simply because it is difficult to do.
This question gave me a moment to reflect on the fact that my Nintendo phase was pre-Waluigi, and so I have no familiarity with the character, and therefore, I have no imagination for Waluigi.
One must ask oneself, "what is Waluigi?" And, seeing the internet, it is clear: the answer is uncertain.
Well, in a more grounded sense people got MAD about fighting Wario. They started to associate intense negativity with the brand.
Waluigi would be wasted on such a thing. So he has to be fun to play and fun to fight against, and that's generally considered a secondary or tertiary consideration. Which is sad.
For instance Yoshimitsu became split between fun and effective, primarily by assigning him limits and granting everyone else kit gaps. Pretty sad.
Smash has a lot of kit gaps, and in many ways the game is about making up for those gaps. It's a bomb waiting to happen.
Waluigi's alright.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KPXtOc06fA