安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



Plus if you ever consider Linux in the future you'll most definitely want an AMD card for an Nvidia one to avoid problems.
You can sell that power guzzler for around $600–700, add another $300–400, and get an RTX 5080 for roughly 10–20% more performance, better upscaling, less heat output and lower power draw.
You’ll also benefit from stronger ray tracing performance but if you mostly play rasterized titles or already get the FPS you want, the upgrade wouldn't make much sense.
So, what do you think, is it worth it in your eyes? I’m genuinely asking.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-5080-founders-edition/34.html
edit if you can sell it for $700 and add only $300 , yes it s worth it. at ebay it s around 700
Maybe check the benchmarks? The 7900xtx is actually faster in raster and in many cases faster than the 5080 in raster.