安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
5 
举报此帖
SteamOS isn't what makes a computer as steam machine though, it's the semi custom hardware steam is using in the machine. They're not using off the shelf parts, they have partnered with amd to design the cpu sand gpu specifically for steamos and gaming.
If it was as simple as installing steamos and that would be it, nobody would buy the computer and would just install the os.
That's probably why the CPU and GPU are embedded and not in a normal socket/pcie slot, just like a laptop.
I mean it seems obvious it even uses laptop SODIMM RAM.
Right now, I think complaining about hardware is a bit moot anyway until prices become known.
A correction, but 36% of people have exactly 32 GB of RAM, not 32 GB or more. The number of people with 32 GB or more is 43.5%, or if you also include the rest of those above 16 GB (but below 32 GB) then it becomes 46%.
Those with 16 GB are another 41.5%.
Those with less than 16 GB are 12.5%. Typically, many of those in the bottom end of any market are people who are unable or unwilling to spend much (they may be people who get hand-me-downs) meaning there's sometimes less opportunity there.
Of course, this is only looking at Steam's market numbers and not any potential new market. Since I doubt they're chasing sales totals that rival some of the better selling consoles anyway, these numbers may be enough.
The RAM/VRAM amount were likely chosen in part because of market conditions with RAM pricing. If it were to have 32 GB RAM and/or 16 GB VRAM but with the same CPU or GPU, then it probably wouldn't gain enough new buyers to offset the extra cost to double the RAM, meaning... it wasn't worth doing it. But at the same time, it will bring concerns for some people, and those concerns are valid for them regardless of how much it does/doesn't sell. Running Linux will help the RAM go further, but they may not be doing themselves favors by advertising it as 4K/60 FPS so much. If the settings need reduced more than people expect, it could create bad will.
This one is pretty pointless to look at. This is reporting base speed and not boost speed (which most CPUs have these days), and clock speed doesn't tell everything about level of performance anyway.
its the laptop versions do to the specs.....it lines up with the laptop version on things like ROPs and core count.....but never mind what the engineers that made it said.....yes its running 200 watts do to being clocked higher then the laptop version but its almost spot on with the laptop version on most of its other specs....