安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
An expensive infratricture for people who can't afford a hobby might not be the slam dunk idea you think it is.
Also being willing to spend Valve's money because you don't wanna spend your money is quaint and all, but I'm not sure Valve is on board.
Finally cloud gaming options exist and they make so much money Valve's avarice should drive them to do it? Or... maybe cloud gaming just isn't quite there. Either way Valve has a lot of experience and expertise to make an informed decision. So far doesn't seem like Valve is interested.
https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/features/cloudgaming
That's what we get.
And say for Xbox, now even the basic core service can stream games. And so i don't even have to upgrade to the new Xbox to buy and play next gen games.
I think it's awesome
As for your initial idea:
It takes the size of Amazon, Microsoft or nVidia to provide cloud gaming in a manner that is serviceable to the masses.
Considering the subscription prices (and it still having queues) and how aggressive nVidia now forces ads on the free plans, it will never be financially viable or even financially feasible for Valve to provide a streaming platform.
Even Google wasn't able to run such a platform with acceptable profit and had to shut it down.