安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



So you want a Steam Machine with $300 less powerful hardware?
Or you just think Valve should sell it at a loss because you're convinced their prebuilt PC is a console and that's how consoles (well not Nintendo) do it.
Well it's not a console and you should switch to PS5 if that's what you want.
Selling at a loss is the only way to attract customers, meaning they'll at least absorb the extra cost of the RAM, but it's a huge mistake to price it at over $800; it'll suffer the same fate as the first one.
Moral of the story: It's better to lose 50% than to kill the Steam Machine a second time.
Valve doesn't think so, and it's their machine. They say it's a PC, it's a prebuilt PC running linux, like a thousand other OEM machines.
So call it a console and be dumbfounded Valve isn't treating it like a console. Stops being a shocker when you accept they're treating it like a PC.
Also, the first "Steam Machines" were 3rd party machines with the Steam OS on it. Valve had no say in the pricing of those.