安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題



So you want a Steam Machine with $300 less powerful hardware?
Or you just think Valve should sell it at a loss because you're convinced their prebuilt PC is a console and that's how consoles (well not Nintendo) do it.
Well it's not a console and you should switch to PS5 if that's what you want.
Selling at a loss is the only way to attract customers, meaning they'll at least absorb the extra cost of the RAM, but it's a huge mistake to price it at over $800; it'll suffer the same fate as the first one.
Moral of the story: It's better to lose 50% than to kill the Steam Machine a second time.
Valve doesn't think so, and it's their machine. They say it's a PC, it's a prebuilt PC running linux, like a thousand other OEM machines.
So call it a console and be dumbfounded Valve isn't treating it like a console. Stops being a shocker when you accept they're treating it like a PC.
Also, the first "Steam Machines" were 3rd party machines with the Steam OS on it. Valve had no say in the pricing of those.