安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



At the very least these concerns get raised by every other user who noticed some detail not meeting their standards. Valve doesn't seem to be concerned or require perfection. So either it's just for funsies or a general idea what trends are.
I don't think hardware manufacturers are relying on the Steam hardware survey as much as you assume. Especially since its roughness isn't a srcret.
No, but i believe microsoft uses the steam hardware survey for analytics. I read about this on one of those gaming news sites. They use it to gauge how good steam is doing and who is using what type of pc. It could influence what games are made for which OS by game developers.
Ok, so are you claiming that the Steam Hardware survey is wholly inaccurate? Or do you just think approximates aren't good enough? If only VR had another 0.3% that would tip the scales for a flood of VR development? Or what?
If something is borderline and some fraction of a percent makes or break it, it's already on thin ice and the decision is inevitable anyway.