安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題



“One way or another, TF2 hats have a lot to answer for.”
Which they helped promote!
PCGamer, in 2010 gave this £30 bundle of crap a review score of 81.
They said this:
“You can buy individual weapons for anywhere between 60p and £3, and hats cost as much as £12.”
https://www.pcgamer.com/team-fortress-2-polycount-pack-review/
Now in 2025, PCGamer say “One way or another, TF2 hats have a lot to answer for.”
Absolute bunch of…
I don't buy lootcrates anyway, if I like a specific item or skin for a game I buy it directly from the Dev or the Steam Community Market. If they have no place in games, everyone believing such should vote with their wallet, but if it's popular it'll likely remain unless regulated out of existence.
I can’t defend Valve on this.
I have one browser without adblocker & I'm getting spammed by ads about gambling any time I use it
Now, do you think there might have been some staff turnover in the last 15 years?
Not to mention the abandonment of DayZ when he couldn't finish it himself.