As a reminder, the current map editor will be removed and replaced.

I’ve started working on the new map creation engine. Before committing too strongly to a specific direction, I need your feedback.

Pixel art stimulates imagination and makes it easier for users to customize the world.

Standard and well-proven, allowing for animations and custom creatures. (This will require quite a bit of work on my side, I don’t fully know how to do this yet.)

2.5D (perspective view)

• Sense of depth

• Ability to add visual effects (lighting, shadows, depth of field / bokeh)

• More intuitive collision system (walls, cliffs, volumes)

• Some elements can no longer be 2D (furniture, vehicles, walls, any large geometric object)

• Requires creating 3D assets

• More complex user customization (3D assets)

• No need for 3D assets

• Much easier import and customization of decorative elements

• Lighter production pipeline

• Leaves more room for player imagination

• Very classic / “old school” approach

• Fewer advanced visual effects

• No significant benefit compared to non-isometric 2.5D

• 2D assets become almost unusable

• 2D assets appear to slide on the ground when the player moves

• Heavier asset production

• Reduced readability

Isometric 2D

• More believable / realistic rendering, gives a 3D illusion

• Strong constraints on assets (fixed angle)

• More complex import of custom sprites

I’m currently leaning toward a 2.5D perspective (non-isometric), with a camera aligned to the grid. I’ve already implemented part of the engine.

This allows:

• simpler collision handling

• dynamic lighting and depth of field

• a result closer to modern JRPG maps

But:

• it requires more work (3D assets)

• it complicates environment customization for users

• it introduces additional technical constraints

👉 Key question: Does this actually add meaningful value to the storytelling of a visual novel?

I probably have a bias due to my 3D-oriented background.

On the other hand, pure 2D remains:

• the simplest solution

• the most accessible

• the most flexible for users

Isometric 2D can be visually impressive if done well.

I’ll let you vote and share your feedback.

2.5D ( no isométric ) => 0
2.5D ( isometric ) => 1
2D ( no isometric ) => 2
2D ( isometric ) => 3