安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I remembered Pte Jack (a notable forum regular here besides me) said SFM contains source codes licensed from other company hence it can't be released with source code to the public. All the community-made scripts are just surface-level scripting and they can't get into SFM's inner working.
If we could made a crowdfunding project to convince any Valve dev to work on SFM a little more. Valve have better priorities to work on. Anything profitable of course.
Until a better software created that provide more and better functions/tools and yet shares the same simplicity of SFM's work process, it will stay for a long time. Maybe an indie company could license Source engine and make their own, better SFM that would be easier for the existing SFM users to migrate without missing out anything and without re-learning most stuff. One can dream...
Oh, about your question. That’s straight up impossible if nobody has full access to both SFMs’ source codes.