It's one thing to make an enemy strong so that the player has a challenge, but to make them stronger and put the player on a time constraint is just a BS way of making the game more difficult. Quite honestly those two things shouldn't be thrown together, and it's the reason I have lost interest in the demo because (I expect more BS like this in the complete game) so I can't say I'm all that interested in it any more....

If I were to play this game i'd just play the Diesel faction. already theyre hands down over powering as they should be. first impressions for me though it was frustrating to deal with flamethrowers since they have such abnormally high range. Apparently they have the same range as snipers? AND can shoot down my zeppelins like... y'know... those things that fly really high in the air, seriously? thats gotta get fixed. Other than that its a good game! keep it up!...

Guys, game concept is fine, BUT what about optimalization??? I play for example B4B on full details 100FPS, but this game looks rly bad and runs on 20-40FPS. Rly? Strategy with so awfull optimalization?

The game defaults to the maximum resolution and graphical settings for some reason, which reduced the main menu to 2-3 FPS. After painstakingly making changes and hitting Apply I was prompted to reboot the game, only to discover none of the changes were saved. I tried twice more with no change....

So I started the game and I'm on a very claustrophobic and awful start position under constant attack by raiders. The AI on the other hand gets a huge upper layer to live on (its HQ also has a gun so no easy raids, while my HQs have no guns and are stupidly easy to knock over), generates infantry that are stronger than mine by default every turn and gets an armor car with a stun attack that enables it to basically knock any units even air units out the fight. I barely get any special resource deposits so I...