Stellaris

Stellaris

Additional Traditions (Stellaris v2.1.*)
Meltup  [开发者] 2017 年 4 月 21 日 下午 3:26
Bugs & Typos
Please, report here any found bugs & typos! Thanks!
最后由 Meltup 编辑于; 2017 年 4 月 26 日 上午 5:47
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 38 条留言
Chemlaka 2017 年 4 月 22 日 上午 9:50 
Hello,

The ascension perk portion of the traditions page doesn't show up like it is shown in the Descriptiong photos. I don't know how else to access it. I made sure to start a new game and check if using it in an already started one worked, but that didn't seem to be the problem.

http://prntscr.com/ezjx9b Unlike the photo in the description, the ascension perk portion isn't on the right-hand side.

Thanks for reading and any and all assistance provided.
Meltup  [开发者] 2017 年 4 月 22 日 上午 11:29 
Mystic Chem, judging from the screenshot, the ascension perk portion of the UI just got cut out. It happens on low resolutions and known problem of Plentiful Traditions template. The solution is to use UI scaling of 0.9 or less in the settings/graphics menu. Hopefully, that helps!
Diocletir 2017 年 4 月 30 日 下午 3:08 
Hello,
it seems to me u used the wrong multiplier for the Inspiration finisher.
Energy is working fine but the minerals multiplier is multiplying the Base minerals you have ( you start with 5 Base mineral production). So in the end the Inspiration finsher givesyou 5% Energy and 0.25 minerals.
Meltup  [开发者] 2017 年 4 月 30 日 下午 3:49 
Thanks for reporting, Fion!

I definately agree that there is some black magic going on with mineral production, however in my tests the multiplier works as intended... at least, as much as it works for "Mining Guild" civic (I took modifier from there).

For starting empire I got before finishing Inspiration tradition tree next:
Monthly Gain: +11.31
From Effects: +5.00
Base: 5.0
Produced: +10.00
Ship Maintenance: -0.41
Consumer Goods (7.0 units): -3.27

After finishing Inspiration tradition (game was on pause all the time):
Monthly Gain: +11.96
From Effects: +5.25
Base: 5.0
Inspiration Tradition Finished: +5.00%
Produced: +10.40
Ship Maintenance: -0.41
Consumer Goods (7.0 units): -3.27

I am honestly not sure wtf is happening there as
1. Base is increased by 5% as intended
2. Produced is increased by less than 5% (why?!)
3. Monthly Gain is increased by more than 5% (that is okau?)
If you can present any numbers from your game then I will be glad to take a look at them.
Cameron Dostya 2017 年 7 月 4 日 下午 11:00 
Found a typo with the navy tradition perk "large hangers" prnt.sc/frsj3u
最后由 Cameron Dostya 编辑于; 2017 年 7 月 4 日 下午 11:01
Wallace 2017 年 7 月 18 日 上午 11:14 
Standardized Survey Protocols from Exploration tradition and To Boldly Go from Discovery tradition do not stack!
When i'm looking at risk modifiers i only se the "To Boldly Go" being in effect. I did pick it up first and then S.S.P. (so it may even not work at all)
最后由 Wallace 编辑于; 2017 年 7 月 18 日 上午 11:22
Meltup  [开发者] 2017 年 7 月 18 日 下午 1:42 
Thanks for reporting, Wallace (Edgar84)!

However I do not see the issue yet. Standardized Survey Protocols do exactly this: Survey Speed increased by +10%, Anomaly discovery chance increased by +15%
It means that this tradition pick increases the speed of survey and the chance of anomaly spawn at the survey's completion. Unlike To Boldly Go this tradition pick doesn't modify anomaly fail risk. Regarding the stacking of the anomaly spawn chance - I don't remember if I ran tests for 1.5 or 1.6 versions of the game but it was perfectly working back then. Maybe you can provide more information if there is indeed an issue?
Wallace 2017 年 7 月 18 日 下午 2:30 
Aaaah. then the problem lies elsewhere. Namely i've had exactly same effects written in both of the tradition steps. Let me take another look at it and just to be sure.

EDIT: I've loaded a geme once again and all seems good. I did remember reading it and seeing 2 exactly same effects but it may have been my bad after all. Either that or one of the mods i was using besides yours got this screwed.
最后由 Wallace 编辑于; 2017 年 7 月 18 日 下午 2:38
[Khorne] Shits'N'Giggles 2017 年 10 月 4 日 下午 5:50 
For the Navy tradition the building can only be built under a planetary administration building meaning that it cannot be built in machine empires.
Meltup  [开发者] 2017 年 10 月 5 日 上午 9:23 
Oh, wow! ᵏʰᵒʳₙᵉ ♥♥♥♥♥'N'Giggles, thanks for pointing that out!
Zares 2017 年 10 月 10 日 下午 1:02 
if = {
limit = {
owner = {
NOT = { has_authority = auth_machine_intelligence }
}
}
custom_tooltip = {
text = "requires_building_capital_1"
planet = {
OR =
has_building = "building_capital_1"
has_building = "building_capital_2"
has_building = "building_capital_3"
}
}
}
}


I think there is missing { after OR =
Kaaz 2017 年 10 月 11 日 上午 12:23 
Hi! Love this mod.
Adding to the bug that Giggles posted above, I am playing a normal empire and im having the same issue.
It states that I require a planetary administration on the planet to build the fleet coordination centre, even though I do have one on that planet.
Meltup  [开发者] 2017 年 10 月 11 日 下午 12:04 
Oh, my God, thanks! :ooh: And thousand apologies for that mistake! It should all work now!
[Khorne] Shits'N'Giggles 2017 年 10 月 11 日 下午 3:42 
No worries and thanks for the fix!
Kaaz 2017 年 10 月 11 日 下午 10:10 
Wow that was fast, thank you, works great!
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 38 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50