安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Instead of monetized servers you could also just offer a donation system, without any perks or stuff like this. I´ve also hosted some servers and I never monetized them, just took in donations and the people actually donated quiet a lot once they noticed it´s worth it.
Just respect their will, they have reasons for this. That’s my opinion.
One way you could make money is by changing it to (Unless given permission) as that implies that someone could host a huge server and give you the creators a cut of the profits! (You can even get staff roles etc.) so that doesn't mean you can't make any money.
If BI rules state that having a monetized violates their TOS / EULA then I understand why you would have no monetizing of your creation.
So you're saying that you're making more money of the costs and you're actually earning money out of someone else work, don't you think?
I don't want to stat a dibate here, it's just how it is and it won't change. If you want to monetize your server, just use IFA3
this
I've a server actually. I don't ask for "donations" of any sort and i'm happy to share it with my friends.
In fact you could legally argue monetized servers do as well.