安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The ranger has a long composite bow. The crossbowman has a siege crossbow.
So, the crossbowman has 1 more accuracy and with hes steel bolts + 4 more ammo.
The ranger has 30 more proficiency, so that 1 accuracy bonus is negligible.
Sure, the siege crossbow has way higher damage and it will one shot recruits. But so will the ranger thanks to hes 6 points in power draw.
The crossbow won't one shot medium - high tier troops because of their armor and health. They will take 2 shots from both the crossbow and the bow and the bow has way higher rate of fire, so it will kill people faster.
In sieges, bowmen will kill enemy bowmen faster than if you had crossbowmen, resulting in the enemy will not get as many arrows off at your troops and you will have less casualties.
Then if you create a custom knighthood order and give your troops the noldor composite bow, no crossbow even comes close.
TLDR: Crossbows take too long to kill people.