商店页面
From The Depths
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测

From The Depths

商店页面
From The Depths >  创意工坊 > Robbaz 的创意工坊 > HMS Ragnarök > 讨论
HMS Ragnarök
描述 讨论1 留言252 改动说明
Mattyboy0066 2017 年 1 月 13 日 下午 1:06
Weaknesses
All and all the Ragnarok is a pretty good ship, managing to stalemate the MBS Burthra, managing to both lose thier guns at the same time. However, I tested it against a simple missile submarine, and the results are; the Ragnarok sunk entirely. It has no anti-submarine capability, meaning even a light sub can sink it as long as it stays underwater. May wanna fix that? dunno
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条，共 15 条留言
Underscorecow 2017 年 1 月 14 日 上午 10:55 
How close to it did you spawn the sub?

It could probably easily shoot the sub if it was spawned farther away *if it has sonar atleast in which case if it doesn`t...ya it needs to be fixed*
最后由 Underscorecow 编辑于; 2017 年 1 月 14 日 上午 10:56
#1
Mattyboy0066 2017 年 1 月 14 日 下午 1:08 
引用自 Supercow1236：
How close to it did you spawn the sub?

It could probably easily shoot the sub if it was spawned farther away *if it has sonar atleast in which case if it doesn`t...ya it needs to be fixed*

It has no sonar. That and I did spawn it far away. I have my sub go 100 meters down, so even if it was able to target the sub it'd still be hard to hit lol.
#2
RandomNOOBY 2017 年 1 月 30 日 下午 3:12 
i modded it gave it several sonar and put sub in shallow water
#3
RandomNOOBY 2017 年 1 月 30 日 下午 3:13 
it died
#4
RandomNOOBY 2017 年 1 月 30 日 下午 3:15 
tested it against 100k lam frigate, no shell it fired got within 3/4 kilometres, i didnt fire for 15mins, then told ai to sink it, red ship needs A LOT of work
#5
RandomNOOBY 2017 年 1 月 30 日 下午 3:17 
tested against 20k flyer, guess what, see a pattern emerging here?
#6
RandomNOOBY 2017 年 1 月 30 日 下午 3:18 
i really hope the next red ship kick s some ass
#7
Mattyboy0066 2017 年 1 月 31 日 下午 2:52 
Yeah... it's not the best for small ships or anything fast... or submerged.
#8
FramedBox 2017 年 2 月 13 日 下午 6:54 
yes but it is beauty in destruction when it gets to kill
#9
Mattyboy0066 2017 年 2 月 13 日 下午 8:54 
not really... it's more of a cheese grater
#10
WitheredTax 2017 年 12 月 23 日 下午 12:29 
引用自 Mattyboy0066：
All and all the Ragnarok is a pretty good ship, managing to stalemate the MBS Burthra, managing to both lose thier guns at the same time. However, I tested it against a simple missile submarine, and the results are; the Ragnarok sunk entirely. It has no anti-submarine capability, meaning even a light sub can sink it as long as it stays underwater. May wanna fix that? dunno
I would recameend you have a large escort of smaller ships, In my world I have the Pilkington which has no capibility of fighting subs, however It has an escort of small yet dureble ships called, Mutrodestoryers they are very versitile little ships, they may be a bit pricey but still better than losing the Ragnarok
#11
BRH0208 2018 年 1 月 7 日 下午 5:46 
I have a 100m/s suiside jet and it didn't stand a chance
#12
Kinami 2018 年 1 月 9 日 下午 12:48 
引用自 Mattyboy0066：
Yeah... it's not the best for small ships or anything fast... or submerged.


Use 20mm autocannons and 40 mm CIWS guns.

For anti sub, use some torpedoes.
#13
EstonianShark 2019 年 3 月 30 日 下午 1:01 
引用自 BRH0208：
I have a 100m/s suiside jet and it didn't stand a chance
100m/s what the ♥♥♥♥
#14
Racist 2020 年 3 月 31 日 下午 1:30 
its outdated, thats its biggest weakness
#15
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条，共 15 条留言
每页显示数： 1530 50