引用自 Nonjojålol：

First let's go through tech. One thing I would like to know is how important are the dates? Some times the tech names says something different.

On infantry Norway should start with HMG and mortars and only have WW1 stuff. Though we did have the m/18 (is actually m/12). We didn't have truck production either (Buses however). I would remove them from Norway unless they are vital or cannot be imported or licence produced.

On Support Battalions I am inclined to give Norway field hospital.

The 120mm m.16 should be m.32. Here's a good site for the equipment Norway had:
http://hem.fyristorg.com/robertm/norge/Weapons_reference.html
I'm not sure Norway should have any of the 1936 equipments if we go by that date. We didn't have any railway artillery but we had railway cannons. Those were from the WW1 era.

On Armor I would remove the Lanchester and the m/34 to better show how behind Norway were on vehicles. The first Utility Vehicle seems accurate enough though.

On Naval I would remove the entire Light Cruiser line and push the Eidsvold class all the way back to 1900. No battlecruisers and battleships either. The WW1 submarine could be name A-Class.
Norway did indeed have interwar AA.

The units seems to be too well trained. The Norwegian troops had around a month of training back in 36. I would also push back the elite rank given to some templates. Templates for main fighting units such as 4th division in Bergen seems to have too many light infantry units in it. Removing one could be considered.