安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
On a related note, it'd be nice if the invisible skins could be done as their own gear, with 0 weight and 0 protection. I often go "naked" on base simply so I don't have to worry about adding the weight of all my gear to the weight of whatever I'm hauling around. Sure, cloth armor only takes up 1 weight each, but that can make the difference between being encumbered and not encumbered. :)
I would have definitely included the 'copies' of the default underwear armor/skins with very very slight weight stats and minimal thermal insulation/armor values (next to nothing, but between cloth armor and none) so that nude mods would make sense from a gameplay perspective and not just an aesthetic one.
Specifically I'm hoping for the possiblity of crafting the items separately so that the amount they take to craft and the amount they add to armor & insulation & durability makes sense for the amount of the character's body that they actually cover. It was less about being able to stack multiple cosmetics and more about modularity, since having them as separate items made more aesthetic sense from a gameplay perspective than using them as skins. (Does that make sense? "aesthetic sense of gameplay" rather than "aesthetic sense of aesthetics" in general"?)
Though I'm not against this either, if it could be added in addition. :D