安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The in game explanation for this is that a unit of silver or gold refers to a tenth as much material as there is in, say a single unit of wood or steel. The reason for this mechanic is to allow for detail in trading without introducing a smaller unit currency to explain decimals. (ie. 100 cents equals a dollar, 100 pence = a pound)
As an example of "detail in trading", if an item 'X' is worth between 5 > X > 15 silver then it would equal 1 without the scaling by 10. This means 100 drugs currently worth 6 silver each would be just as valuable as 100 drugs currently worth 14 silver each, which would remove some of the depth from the different ways of making money through the mass production of low value items.
Just realised how much of a tangent I went on to a simple question. Sorry if this seems like I was being rude or something. ┐(‘~`;)┌
P.S If you hover over the ingredient silver or gold in a bill which has multiple options for material. (such as a sculpture at an art bench) It says they are small volume ingredients and explains the in game reason.
P.P.S Jade isn't a small volume ingredient.