安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








Some of the hoppers a have a wierd crafting cost, but this has been corrected, but not released. i am hard at work on fixing the new multiplayer bugs, and implementing the UI that DJ intruduced for the default hoppers. I have got the UI working in single player, but multiplayer is a pain in the ass.
Back to your question: The hoppers are more expensive because they simply are faster and better in many ways. They output item faster, they pick up items faster, they update faster. This is why they cost more. And i wont change that.
"This will add 12 new storage hoppers to the game, that are much faster then the normal ones, and can store anywhere from 1 to 2000 items! "
But in the event there isnt fast MS then I think a Multiblock Hopper would be nice. I also suggest that if you do think about it or work on it, Dont have it look like a Hopper...Maybe something more unique...something that would fit a Multiblock structure.
EDIT: Doh! just now read the few posts above mine. Still though, i want to foot stomp this :)