Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem








When an application needs memory, that memory is immediately reserved as virtual memory. However, the memory space is *not* allocated as RAM before it is actually needed, i.e. read from or written to. The CPU and operating system take care of all that. Applications just reserve memory and then access the memory sooner or later.
So, that 4 GB consists of reserved memory that has not been actually needed yet.
The 10% difference you noticed is quite constant for CS (for some apps, the difference is much bigger - my Steam client shows right now 97 MB RAM, 215 MB VM).
It is also fine if some of the reserved memory is never actually needed. VM reservations are basically just advance bookings and carry very little cost.
I guess that is why they use the word "commit" rather than "allocate" with VM reservations.