Space Engineers

Space Engineers

Jump Drive Critical Explosion
Bullet-Sponge 2016 年 9 月 6 日 下午 1:17
reactor Critical Explosion
could you make reactors explode when they are going meltdown from damage
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 18 条留言
SpaceJackalTim 2016 年 9 月 7 日 上午 6:20 
yessss!!!!
paulsilver 2016 年 9 月 21 日 下午 2:16 
that would be so awesome
paulsilver 2016 年 12 月 1 日 下午 2:03 
in real life objects dont clip through eachother.
dRuPpI 2016 年 12 月 15 日 下午 12:23 
well real jumpdrives also dont't work like that because they don't exist :steamhappy:
paulsilver 2016 年 12 月 15 日 下午 3:22 
point taken XD
Rastro 2017 年 1 月 15 日 下午 7:59 
Nuclear reactor wouldn't make that big a boom, at best it would blow out that part of the ship and throw your ships balance off.

This would be more in-line with less stable reactor types like antimatter, hypermatter, maybe fusion(???), etc...

reactors that produce more 'pure' forms of energy than heat and radiation made by fission
paulsilver 2017 年 1 月 21 日 上午 5:52 
more forms of energy wouldnt be bad either. all with there own advantages and disadvantages.
UserEl 2017 年 2 月 8 日 下午 6:26 
i think the reacter used in SE is a fusion reactor. aka the ones that tend to esplode in sci-fi
97cweb 2017 年 3 月 10 日 下午 7:51 
fusion is not a chain reaction, therefore it cannot explode in an uncontrolled manner, it will just dump plasma out of the hole. Fission relies on this chain reaction, causing a massive explosion/meltdown. SE uses a fission reactor as it uses uranium. Fusion is hydrogen mainly and can work with all elements up to iron on the periodic table
Navarone 2017 年 8 月 23 日 上午 7:40 
Well I mean superheated plasma isn't exactly a good thing to have around...
Doctor_Chuckles 2017 年 9 月 1 日 上午 8:38 
If you found a way to get a fusion rector to explode, then you'd be dealing with some form of voodoo, fusion reactions dont work like that. they have to be forced to happen, and cant force eachother to happen. As to fission reactor not exploding... yes, they can explode. Violently. Destructively. Not as big as nukes or anything, as nukes use highly purified uranium/plutonium, where as reactor use rather low concetrations of fissionable uranium. Fission reactors may seem to only melt down because melting point is usually reached before exploding, and molten uranium doesnt tend to explode to well. As in antimatter, hyppermater and all those fun sci-fi reactors, seeing as we dont even neccesarily know these things to begin with one can only assume that they would even make power to that we can use, as to explosions caused by these things, who knows. Anyway, just figured i'd point these things out as to avoid further confusion. Sorry for the long comment...
最后由 Doctor_Chuckles 编辑于; 2017 年 9 月 1 日 上午 8:40
Sir Luis 2017 年 11 月 30 日 下午 4:03 
i wish the exploding power was at least 5 times stronger
TinkerHat 2017 年 12 月 8 日 下午 7:57 
引用自 dRuPpI
well real jumpdrives also dont't work like that because they don't exist :steamhappy:
yet, so that point is dumb
icecold951 2018 年 4 月 8 日 下午 3:49 
引用自 ScoutingJ
i think the reacter used in SE is a fusion reactor. aka the ones that tend to esplode in sci-fi

Fusion reactors don't use uranium. This is the Grayson LAC reactor. Now waiting to see if anyone knows what I'm talking about.
Sir Luis 2018 年 4 月 8 日 下午 4:38 
i wish the exploding power was at least 50 times stronger
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 18 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50