Insurgency

Insurgency

Day of Infamy
S Compton 2016 年 1 月 18 日 上午 11:41
Technical wish
Idk if its possable but could you get rid of the restricted area singal that stops you from shooting from behind the enemys.

to me this would allow a more tactical and realistc exsperince
< >
正在显示第 1 - 13 条,共 13 条留言
SomeoneSomewhere 2016 年 1 月 18 日 上午 11:53 
No, otherwise people just sit still ,let enemies pass and then shoot them in the back. Don't make players worry even more than they already do.
IAmNotMatthew 2016 年 1 月 18 日 下午 12:01 
The Restricted Area thing should only stay on spawn areas.
S Compton 2016 年 1 月 18 日 下午 12:30 
yes that would be nice

引用自 IAmNotMatthew
The Restricted Area thing should only stay on spawn areas.
S Compton 2016 年 1 月 18 日 下午 12:31 
引用自 Rydekk
No, otherwise people just sit still ,let enemies pass and then shoot them in the back. Don't make players worry even more than they already do.
and in war did people just keep moving instead of holding a pasitioned like they were ordered
SomeoneSomewhere 2016 年 1 月 18 日 下午 12:38 
引用自 cedwardcompton
引用自 Rydekk
No, otherwise people just sit still ,let enemies pass and then shoot them in the back. Don't make players worry even more than they already do.
and in war did people just keep moving instead of holding a pasitioned like they were ordered

No but this is a game, and we already have enough angry Voice rants in the game.
S Compton 2016 年 1 月 18 日 下午 12:39 
引用自 Rydekk
引用自 cedwardcompton
and in war did people just keep moving instead of holding a pasitioned like they were ordered

No but this is a game, and we already have enough angry Voice rants in the game.
ok wth do you even mean. were talking about cutting back the restiction. if you want to rant then leave
SomeoneSomewhere 2016 年 1 月 18 日 下午 2:11 
引用自 cedwardcompton
引用自 Rydekk

No but this is a game, and we already have enough angry Voice rants in the game.
ok wth do you even mean. were talking about cutting back the restiction. if you want to rant then leave

I don't think you understand here,

So you want your restrictions to be pushed back so you have more defensive area to be in. I say no because otherwise the attackers will just be bottlenecked near their spawns or allow them to be shot in the back all the time. I can guarantee people are going to rant, hence I said the above.

S Compton 2016 年 1 月 18 日 下午 2:24 
ok i see but the spawns pudsh back and it will be more tactical
Badger 2016 年 1 月 18 日 下午 6:11 
Maybe just make it to where the Americans can actually get in the bunkers? Maybe just hve it to where there's only one staircase they can go in and they can only go to the front of the bunkers.
[SFW]Jose.Berzeker 2016 年 1 月 19 日 上午 2:42 
first of all, its already classified as spawnkilling. second, its a dumb thing to do.
=M$=Gilman93 2016 年 1 月 19 日 上午 7:59 
the devs already said in the livestream that even thought they consider this as a realistic game they don't mind doing unrealistic things for the sake of balance, in any videogame you can't just let some guy be able to sneak inside the spawn, wait for the enemy to spawn and then shoot an missile on them or blow up a c4, that already happens in insurgency and it's just straight unfair, and in extreme cases you can get spawn trapped were there's guy covering every way out of your spawn and you just can't move, something that always happen in siege when the defending team spawns around b, so, for the sake of what makes a videogame fun to play, please don't this
最后由 =M$=Gilman93 编辑于; 2016 年 1 月 20 日 上午 7:57
S Compton 2016 年 1 月 19 日 下午 3:55 
ok the protecton would protect spawn but the things like the usa not being able to go into there own bunkers
Rock 2016 年 1 月 20 日 上午 5:42 
Sorry, but I'm with everyone else on this. It just does not seem like the best thing to implement, especially for the sake of balance which plays an important factor along with realism in (surely) the development of this mod. Including Insurgency itself.
< >
正在显示第 1 - 13 条,共 13 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50