安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








thought about a ranking system depending on not achieved quotas....
Although i realy don't see it coming ......
I was aiming for them to work depending on my quotas.
As there are no Ingots for the new ores there can't be any corrsponding quotas.
In taleden's code, there's a section which allows ores to be added which don't correspond to the ingots they produce. It is a dictionary called ORE_PRODUCT. By adding new entries for each item, you can get tim to recognize how to process new ores.
Here's an example that adds Better Stone ores, which I'm using quite happily so far. Paste it into the spot where ORE_PRODUCT is, and make sure to delete the comment above in order to fit within the character limit.
You can add as many as you'd like, but unfortunately TIM assumes that each ore only produces 1 product.
To support the ores which have multiple ingot products, I would need to rewrite a section of the code to understand that there are ores which produce multiple ingots. Then it would need to know that some of those ores are better to use than others when you need a particular ingot.
Frankly TIM is written in spaghetti paradigm so cleaning it up will be a few hours of work. There's a lot of abstraction it simply doesn't make, so things are repeated in many places. If the quota fulfilment sections were written as a constrain solving problem, it'd be a lot easier to change.
For me it says I am 143 lines over the limit. Did you remove some things?