安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
1 
举报此帖
(3,mtef_team_0|mtef_use_exact_number,0,aif_start_alarmed, 7,[]), # Player/defenders
Seems like the player's army has a fixed exact number of 7 to be spawned. I'll make it 14.
Between 25-30 villagers are spawned and around 36 bandits ((10 + player lvl )* 1,2).
Freeing villages from bandits isn't the big problem, it's when enemy lords raid your village, you try to defend it and the villagers aid you, like a nearby, friendly army would in combat.
I don't even know why this is done the way it is in the base game. I mean, it makes sense for villagers to be there, but not as fighting soldiers in the defense. They're absolutely useless and make it incredibly hard to actually win any kind of village defense fight. Even with all the difficulty settings all the way down, you get kicked around pretty good when half of your troops are punching bags with sticks.
Ah, thnx for clarifiying. I'll take a look at the script tomorrow and reset the code for bandits.
I also found something that may or may not be a bug. While trying to scare the enemy away, i could use influence to get an enemy lord to raid another village of my faction instead. I feel like that shouldn't be an option when two factions are at war.
why not ? if the lord could be convinced that he can go raid this more profitable village without being attacked by your army an villagers sounds like a win. since then he doesn't have to risk losing everything hes gotten so far.
Huh, never thought about it that way. That makes a lot of sense, actually. Thanks for the input!