安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








So I did a few tests and found that once I've become Lord protector as the presiding regent, I am basically the emperor (game mechanically). So the game treats me as if I am the emperor which is fine. So If I died as the 'regent, lord protector, whatever' then the next person in line takes over. But that person that takes over (whatever the succession model may be) is just taking over a 'regency' so what I'd call a fake emperorship. At first this confused me as it would mean that any person standing to take over (say it was an elective succession) would actually lose out as all he is getting is a 'lord protectorship' position which he will have to give up as soon as the real liege reaches of age. But I guess it makes sense, if a lord protector was to die then of course the succession model (whatever it may be) will have to take it's course. I think that once a lord protector gets into power that the only succession law that should be availble is elective. This way it makes sense that regency position changes (if it changes at all) before the child Emperor reaches of age.
Ok that's just a minor comment. Anouther thing is, there isn't any real loss for the guy that takes the emperorship title as Lord protector. What I'm trying to say is that the real Emperor child loses all his titles and becomes a nobody until he reaches of age while this 'Regent' takes over until then right? So like what's to stop this 'regent' from not giving up his new found power. The Child Emperor has nothing if the regent were to simply decline giving back the Emperorship title back to it's true owner. I tested this and found that the Child emperor upon reaching of age could not do squat due to not having anything and lost immediately. So in that regard it's quite unbalanced I think.
These are just some thoughts that I jotted down very quickly so if you need me to elaborate or clear it up (as I wrote all that pretty quickly so there may be some grammatical, spelling errors which may make certain things I wrote not make any sense) then please let me know.
Great mod nonetheless :D
Part 2, the child emperor is supposed to declare a war and raise a force and call all loyal vassals and relations to arms if you refuse the demand for the titles. I've no real experience with scripting wars so I guess it didn't pan out. I think I'll limit the regent title to the primary title in a future update.
Thanks for playing it and for the input :)
I'll do some more testing later today when I get home.
I do have one quick question though, does any new title that the 'Lord protector, regent' attain default back to the 'Emperor' in waiting once he/she reaches of age? (I guess I could test that to be fair but thought it better to ask).
Either way great work boss.
I am considering allowing for more possibility for regents to grab power in case of incapable kings and so on, but I am afraid of some unforseen side effects, especially if the regent is simply the current heir, which might mess things up. xD
In assert_regency_events for example I made in my special event when chancellor becomes regent:
immediate = {
FROM = {
any_demesne_title = {
IF = {
limit = { has_title_flag = liege_regent }
grant_title_no_opinion = ROOT
}
}
}
IF = {
limit = { muslim = no }
set_special_character_title = title_prime_minister
}
IF = {
limit = { muslim = yes }
set_special_character_title = title_grand_vizier
}
}
But I am only getting the prime minister to work fine, not the grand vizier, what am I doing wrong?