安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








-40% flame spread
No airblast
+25% primary ammo increase
+50% Accuracy
+75% Damage
-75% Range
No airblast.
I think you can make it more accurate by narrowing the particle stream.
Pros: +Can repair, and even upgrade engineer building (at the cost of ammo of course)
+50% Ammo
+Ammo pickups give more ammo
+15% Damage
Cons: -50% range
-10% Move speed
-No afterburn effect
^
|
|
(Outdated)
Since the damage is also based on how many particles come across the target, focusing it in one point would be like the ultimate 1hit ko thing ( as long as it hits ), while if you make it wider ( but keep the same amount of particles ) you have more chances of hitting, but you end up with the same trick to scatterguns ( if you don't put all dem bullets in the meat, the damage'll be lower ).
50% more dmg
10% less speed
no airblast
75% range less
half the long after burn affect
can repair enginner building but half as good as a normal enginner