安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








Make subsystem HP lower, for example.
Make capture time against marine frigates lower.
Decrease engine speed by 10 across the board.
Any of those changes make battlecruisers extremely vulnerable to an opponent who doesn't just say 'oh a bc, let me just place 10 ion frigs in front of it - it says anti-capital in the description!'.
Such a nerf to BCs will just make them slow expensive DDs - I'd rather have 2 or 3 DDs than a BC considering these numbers.
You can't just nerf damage and HP. These changes bring uniformity rather than balance.
people on the forums didnt like my 1st nerf when they did 3k dmg instead of 6k and wanted it to be even lower, and scale like HW1, so thats what i did..
also a BC with level 0 armor will beat 10 ion frigs with level 2 armor btw, even with the nerf they got in the current patch. HP wasnt changed, and thats the point, 3 DD should be equal to 1 BC, though 1 BC will still beat 3 DDs if the BC has L2 armor.. just saying.