安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








Aside from which, i'm not advocating completely negating capture ships. all such an "upgrade" would do is bring their capture speed back down to their original values (assuming that the opponent has all 3 capture speed upgrades researched, but idk if the AI does that or not)
It also does not help that there is no "mass attack capture ships" order, unlike repair ships which do get one. which would likely be an alternate solution.
Of course my experience is based on what are deemed "normal" game settings, where the AI apparently gets some form of assistance (which i did not realize until i dug into the match settings), which means that by the time i get a destroyer, the AI (typically) has an army of frigates, including several capture ships (this is playing against the Vaygr/Hiigaran, the other two factions are their own nightmare), so what was supposed to be an equalizer is quickly turned into an ironic escalation of the original problem.