安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








Some things I think about: flashbangs over the walls into A site, underpass at A site, mid control and going mid to B, hopping over the mid wall as T's and attacking squeeking and window at the same time your teammates push mid, etc. I think there are theoretically plenty of options for T's, but that's the importance of testing, isn't it?
maybe removal or changing the bridge (raise the wall/fence on the bridge??) would make B more difficult to retake thus encouraging CT to be a bit more present in the site?
For example, even B on mirage (often considered the least accessible bombsite in all of counter-strike), you can probe, look for picks, make sure the CTs aren't stacking on an eco round, etc, without fully committing to the site. I feel like the way B site on this map is currently laid out, you have to more or less commit yourself in order to gain any information.