安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
That said, I haven't followed the Janissary tree through past the second reform yet. Honestly, any military strategy is viable here, the choices seem to be: Logistical Army, with larger force limits, decreased costs, and eventually no professionalism loss for mercenaries; a Basic Professional army, with a discipline boost and some other bland bonuses, but no real weaknesses; a Cavalry army, with boosts to flanking range, cavalry combat ability (potentially stacking with Aristocratic Ideas and the Hippodrome), and cavalry/infantry ratio increases; and the two special chains: Greek Fire, which is heavy on the Fire phase of combat, with penalties to shock damage received, cavalry combat ability, and the cost and size of your army, and huge bonuses to infantry, and some minor bonuses to siege or artillery combat, alternately.