安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
If you are running RHS mods, the ZU gun is quite effective if mounted by high level AI garrisoned at outpost/airports.
On vanilla, the static AA is pretty useless due to the limited fire arc and tendency to be picked off by attack chopper missile at distance.
You can try unlocking the HMG gun in arsenal and deploying them en mass into outpost manned by militia. 10-20 of them can dent airpower a bit. But reality is most of the time you will loose to NATO/CSAT attacks.
Holding territory is not a given, you just have to keep capturing and ceding territory repeatedly. Around Kavala, I have captured the outpost/resource/seaport 8+ time and drastically drained regional manpower. US attacks are spawning so infrequently that I can make territorial gains without even garrisoning these places. This is a solo campaign against US alone. So keep at it. Keep draining enemy manpower, holding territory is a secondary goal.