安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I think you misunderstod my question, ill try to clarify
i tried settup of both bluefor and normal version of antistasi. in the normal version, where the player is greenfor, the force initialy holding altis(gov?) is usmc, while the invading force establishing a foothold is russia. In the greenforversion, we got bluefor player vs Chdkz initialy controling the island while russia again invading.
I seem to remember that it used to be a version where the player was greenfor, with russia initialy holding the island and usmc invading, in a all v all. What i was wondering is, is that still posible, and if so, how?
Suggestion, what if you make a framework so that what faction is inv/gov can be sett before gamestart? That way it would be more flexible, and i guess you that way could sett it upp in a way where you would not need to maintain both greenfor and bluefor version since theese would be sett ingame. Also making it in a library like framework, im thinking it may be easier to fix the scenario for more mods, loading say, a patrol object for patrols that can be bulit from a patrol template and loaded from a faction-spesific library, if i make sense. So like you can define force composition and units in a file for each possible gov/inv faction and then just load it for the side its assigned